Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZHAR versus UNITED TEXTILE MILLS THROUGH MANAGER

Section 2 (viii) (a) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 11A Salary Payment Act (IV 1936), Section 15 Financial Institutions (Financial Resources) Ordinance ( XLVI of 2001) Closing of mills by owners without the permission of Section 19 Authority Workers - Claims for liability, purchase of such mills by the respondent company in an open auction under approval by the Banking Court Recovery Case Not to accept acceptance against such mills. According to the complainant's request from the company of such mills as the complainant, the legitimate management of such mills and the company of the respondent was quite different, the respondent company did not Was purchased at an open auction, free from all liabilities, claims, defects. The respondents allege that, after the purchase of such mills, the respondents accepted a new birth; after the purchase, the responsibility was not accepted. The workers of such mills cannot be held responsible for the payment of liability to the workers of such mills, and as such, the workers of such mills were not legally obliged to pay the liabilities of the complainants in these circumstances. The request was discarded \ r \ n how to become a advocate from Jehlum lawyer