Section 302 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Constitution of Section 7 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-evaluation of the evidence after the exchange of testimony in the firing of the Witness Science Laboratory in which a constable was killed Arrested on the spot The trial court maintained the sentence awarded by the trial court after the conclusion of the trial and the death sentence of the accused was maintained by the High Court, the accused was taken by the prosecution. The witnesses were interesting witnesses and recovery could not be relied on as a weapon of crime. The complainant had no personal motive for the accuracy of the Franz Science Laboratory and was an unwanted witness to himself, his testimony alone was sufficient to maintain the conviction, reinforced by the statements of other eye witnesses, Were members of the police party. The shootings were exchanged with the robbers and they were arrested after police officers had no reason to deny their testimony, for lack of personal interest in the matter, at the same time possessing guns and vacant material. The supply also did not undermine the clear value of the laboratory's positive results to the forensic science laboratory. At the same time, not only the free and unwanted evidence of the complainant, but also the police personnel who were the witnesses to the incident, were on record. The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the search of the accused by the two courts. Was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
