QASIM JAN versus STATE
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Re-examination of the evidence The defense was requested to commit the murder of his real brother trial court on the FIR filed by his father. The accused was sentenced to death, which was confirmed by the accused by the High Court Plaintiff that the defense evidence was not properly considered during the trial. Defense witnesses have never appeared before the investigating officer in order to reveal their personal interest and the fact that the incident was disclosed. For the first time at trial, contradicting the prosecution's version, their testimony was not very helpful to the defense, the defendant failed to identify any mitigating circumstances for lack of conviction. Was to be killed and his father charged. Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the trial court as well as the High Court, dismissing the High Court's leave to appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kunjah lawyer