Find a Lawyer

IQBAL HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Allotment of plot without constitution of section & 53 and Constitution 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1991 duties and duties of public workers, the High Court dismissed the constitutional application by the petitioners / allies, stating that It was stated that the Chief Minister is not legally competent and the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 1979 is capable of allotting a plot in the urban area without forming any scheme and that the Chief Minister could not comply with his wishes. The procedure for land transfer in the city Karachi was not followed. The Chief Minister, including the Chief Minister, can only deal in a fixed procedure under a permanent approval scheme under the parameters of public property law and not in his whites, even if applicants by the Chief Minister, the relevant authorities Such an order was passed in favor of. No higher authority is obliged to follow such an illegal and invalid order. It will be aided by the good administrator and their duty if the authorities point to higher positions that exceed their legal limit and against the law. Violators and constitutional mandates should be informed by authorities that the legal consequences of such actions may be in compliance with an unlawful and arbitrary order. Neither was subordinate to the forums nor valid in the eyes of the law, there was no illegal action or any violation of the prescribed rules of the law, while rejecting the applicant's constitutional petition. However, the order was not summoned. Supreme Court Interference \ r \ n list of supreme court advocates from Noor kot lawyer