IQBAL KHAN versus STATE
Section 9 (c) and 19 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 75 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 511 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Court convict the accused under Section 75 And was bound by the PPC during sentencing. In the present judgment, the details of each previous conviction relied upon to prosecute the prosecution failed to prove in its judgment that the accused was the former culprit of any offense under the provisions of the Chapter XI and XVII, PPC. As it cannot be punished under Section 111111 for proving previous convictions under Section 75, PPC mode, the CCP also did not apply the property. It was also required to present a certificate signed by the officer in charge of the jail in which the sentence or part thereof was punished or to guarantee the conviction under which the conviction was imposed. Violated, punished and punished. The accused under section 75, PPC was not sustainable in law and accordingly a prosecution was held which failed to provide strong evidence regarding the acquisition of assets through drug trafficking, narcotic substances. Penalty for confiscation of assets of accused under section 19 of the Control of Goods. , 1997, was also set aside under Section 9 (c) of the said Act, the conviction and sentence of the offenders, which was not challenged, and the appeal for leave of appeal after the appeal was changed. , Which was partially allowed in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer