Section 5 365A / Anti-Anti-Terrorism Act (VI XX XX XX XXVII), Section (E) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The abductor stated in his statement in Chief Examinations It was alleged that two suspects had abducted him in the car while the third accused went to his custody to provide food and he was an active member of the gang of criminals who challenged some part of the kidnapping statement. Was not done, and even so, no suggestion was given. Examine that the third accused mentioned above was not an active participant of the other accused. You will be charged with the same duty under the law attached to the accused in the crime, and the defense failed to show that the third suspect was not - in view of the circumstances leading up to the incident and the subsequent events. Can be safely charged with participating in the crime and responsible for the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
