Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

AHMED HUSSAIN versus STATE


Section 5 365A / Anti-Anti-Terrorism Act (VI XX XX XX XXVII), Section (E) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The abductor stated in his statement in Chief Examinations It was alleged that two suspects had abducted him in the car while the third accused went to his custody to provide food and he was an active member of the gang of criminals who challenged some part of the kidnapping statement. Was not done, and even so, no suggestion was given. Examine that the third accused mentioned above was not an active participant of the other accused. You will be charged with the same duty under the law attached to the accused in the crime, and the defense failed to show that the third suspect was not - in view of the circumstances leading up to the incident and the subsequent events. Can be safely charged with participating in the crime and responsible for the crime.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Shangla lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.