Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZHAR versus UNITED TEXTILE MILLS

Section 2 (viii) (a) and 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 11A Salary Payment Act (IV 1936), Section 15 Financial Institutions (Financial Restoration) Ordinance (XLVI of 2001), closure of mills by owners without the permission of Section 19 authority workers - Claims for liability, filed by the respondent company in the open auction of such mills in a banking court recovery Respondent's Company Complained by Mills Workers Claiming Such Mills Worker's Claim by Respondent Company Approved in Recovery Case Complaint or request. The legitimate management of such mills and the company of the respondents was quite different. The respondents purchased such mills free of all liability at the open auction. Defects and allegations The Respondent Company did not, after the purchase of such mills, accept a new birth responding company, after its purchase. Barriers to payment of liabilities to the workers of such mills cannot be considered as successors to such mills, and as such, the workers of such mills were not legally obliged to pay dues. advocates from Tank lawyer