Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TALHA HUSSAIN ALIAS NOMAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (i) (a) West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 (d) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) ) The prosecution's evidence was fully supported by medical evidence, the wife and the victim's son testified to the truth of the deceased's driver's statement, which immediately revealed to the inmates of the house that the two men were Fired and his third colleague came at him. The motorcycle, on which he escaped, could not be dropped because of the presence of the deceased driver at the scene of the incident, the victim's driver, in the presence of the judicial magistrate, identified the role of the accused in the parade. A report by the Ballistic Expert played by him at the time of the crime case revealed that the recovered pistol was fired from the possession of the accused in his possession at the crime scene recovered from the scene of the incident. ? The charge of recovering a weapon of crime that could have been recovered could be used against the accused, as it is an important evidence to prove the crime in which the accused had undoubtedly withdrawn his confession, but relied on it. This is likely to be the case, as the disclosure of these incidents in their confessional statements was completely corroborated by the prosecution's evidence that the procedure adopted by them for the purpose of reducing the crime was to go home. The accused also revealed the motive for killing the victim for sectarian reasons, which indicated that they The confession was voluntary and truthful and was delayed by ten days, depending on the facts and circumstances of the case. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sohawa District Daska lawyer