RAO MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Rr 3 (c), 4 (b) (v) and 6 (3) (c) Remarks on the dismissal of the service appellant by the Punjab Subordinate Judicial Services Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), a civil judge less judicial magistrate. Made a profit. In the Annual Secret Report, Remarks issued a showcase notice to the appellant after regular inquiries touching on his integrity authority and after granting him the opportunity of a personal hearing after his response was found to be improper, he declared the invalid notification invalid. Was dismissed as the officer. And the Counseling Officer of the Annual Secret Report examined the appellant as a corrupt and dishonest officer authority, complying with the relevant provisions of the relevant law before granting an invalid injunction against the appellant. Nor can it be said about the fair and proper method of law for the fair administration of justice, that they were unheard of, or that they were deprived of the right to explain their position, The appellant had not raised any petition for prejudice, prejudice and misconduct. Assessment of authority by authority, based on reliable material, information and personal observation, was treated fairly and equitably by the authority in the appellant's case, no interference by the tribunal was guaranteed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
