Contrary to the Section 5 Annual Confidential Report, Remarks Pro Pharma promotion performance was lower than the appeal appeal status as Additional District and Sessions Judge 7, 2006 which was rejected by the Authority on 10 6 2013, the decision of the Authority on 11 6 2013 Was delivered and he filed his appeal within 30 days from the date of the civil decision. The servant simply had the option of filing an appeal immediately after the expiry of 90 days from the date of filing the appeal, or he could wait for the same and service appeal to be filed within 30 days, which the appellant would retain for seven years. Waiting for a representation decision. And when he was denied representation, he filed an appeal within 30 days. When the appellant made negative comments in his three ACRs but his representation was treated as counsel in nature, the appellant. 'S representation was dismissed on the grounds that its performance was found to be below average and nothing was effective against the applicant's additional district restriction on its development. Sessions Judge Appellant cannot be denied his promotion right from this date when he was not eligible for the same rejection of representation for pharma promotion then the authority was directed to promote the pro forma. Because the date from the Additional District and Sessions Judge in which his immediate junior was appealed with all the developmentally backwards privileges
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2015
