Sections 47, 104 and 115 of the Balochistan Civil Disputes (Sharia) Regulations, 1976, Regulation 4 (2) against the order passed in the implementation of the Ordinance of the West Pakistan Civil Courts (II of 1962), Section 18 Secondly, the defendants who filed the modification of the amendment to the Authorized Forum or the rules for conversion rules, filed the present revision petition against the execution court's order under which their objection to the objection was dismissed. ? The present review petition was allowed before the High Court, under which the accuracy case was filed under the provisions of the Balochistan Civil Disputes (Sharia Appliance) Regulation 1976 and not under Dastur-ul-Amol Deewani, Qalat 1952, section 18 of the Civil Court Ordinance 1962. Under either Regulation 4 (2) of the Balochistan Civil D was amended or appealed before the Assembly, the ISPETS (Sharia Application) Regulations, 1976 objection was raised and the decision was taken to implement, exclude Or to the satisfaction of the decree, which falls within the purview of Section 47, CPC and the aggression approved by the court This unidentified order was an order under section 104, CPC. The review can be turned into an appeal and the appeal can be changed to a review if it is not necessary the present review was not before the High Court, and if it is not converted into an appeal, the defendant can be heard before the hearing. Will lose the favor of The forum was not present to change any legal restriction on appeal from the date of its establishment. The amendment petition was filed by the High Court only after it was converted into an appeal and it was referred to the Council of Ministers for its decision.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
