Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 161 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 11 Suit for Declaration of Limitation Order Judiciary, Jurisdiction for the registration of jurisdiction was made in favor of the plaintiff in the settlement record Was. Which was corrected on his statement that the plaintiff did not challenge the order of the Settlement Officer in respect of the plaintiffs' registration, which was an order of consent once a party had jurisdiction over the matter before the court. If I took any position, then it could not be changed and aside from taking a new position on the same subject, the matter was finally decided by the collector on the basis of the consent of the plaintiff that the plaintiff. He was the owner of a new proceeding after several delays in connection with the same issue. They will fall under the principle that as already settled in the first phase of litigation, possession and possession have been decided and cannot be reopened by either party, neither the plaintiff nor the suit. The ownership suit was neither owned nor changed in its name; the current suit was barred and was not. Unless an appropriate court fee was paid that could not properly be presented to the appropriate plaintiff until the plaintiff failed to prove his claim and his case was rightly dismissed by the courts, No illegal or irregularities were identified in the unanticipated decisions passed by. Courts below review were dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
