Find a Lawyer

ASMAT ULLAH versus REGISTRAR TRADE UNION BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA

Section 54 (?) re-election of the trade union was made by the mutual consent of the parties. , It cannot be believed by the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court that the voters were not allowed to cast their ballots and the result was made on the basis of rigging. And it cannot be proven without recording the evidence and how the fraud was done, why It needs proof of how the respondents were not allowed to cast their ballots, which party charged, the Labor Court order was separated by credible evidence and the matter The case was dismissed. According to the parties' requests, the Labor Court received a remand for framing the case and recording the evidence.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015

• DAD KARIM v. ISHAQ 2015 CLC 107
• SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD. v. ARBAB NAJEEBULLAH 2015 PLD 110
• MUHAMMAD AKBAR v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2015 PTD 116
• Engineer ZAMRAK KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary 2015 MLD 117
• Mst. RAZYA GHULAM v. The GENERAL PUBLIC 2015 PLD 127
• HIFEEZA v. GENERAL PUBLIC 2015 PLD 132
• DUR MUHAMMAD v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2015 YLR 135
• SALEH MUHAMMAD v. ARZ MUHAMMAD 2015 PLD 135

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2015 →

registration advocate from Warah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes