Section 11 of the Prohibition of Marriage of Children Act (XIX of 1929), sections 4 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan Judicial Magistrate, in the statement of the birth of his daughter and the registration of an FIR against the defendant, it was stated that no one ever had Not kidnapped, she entered into marriage with the defendant in her free will and consent. NADRA officials confirmed that the alleged kidnapper was 25 years old, and Nika Nama said he had married a legally responsible kidnapper, appeared before the High Court himself, and that Confirmed that no one had kidnapped her and she had married the defendant with her consent and the alleged kidnapper of the free will, who had attained the age of majority, and Sui Georis being a Muslim From then on, he had every right to use it for full social and civil rights. And by exercising such right, she entered into a valid marriage / marriage with the respondent, such marriage was not a violation of the provisions of the Child Marriage Regents Act, 1929; And Willie's consent. , Was not required; because Muslim women in Sui Joris can enter into a valid marriage / customary marriage and the alleged abductor is in conformity with Islamic law due to the absence of consent for the marriage of the alleged abductor. The marriage was not invalid, the allegations made by her were based on misunderstanding and misunderstanding, the constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
