Find a Lawyer

FAZAL KHALIQ versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY

Section 18 and 54 reference to the court's determination of jurisdiction The reference filed by the collector at the request of the landlord was rejected by the court on the ground that the decision on the question of limitation was referred by the referee court to its jurisdiction. Could not use it. Under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, a referee cannot go behind a court reference and can not be rejected because of a restriction, or the reference was presented illegally because the request for reference was timely The High Court rejected the order dismissing the reference. The case was remanded to the referee court for judgment

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD YASIR ANWAR v. VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY 2014 PLC(CS) 459
• MUHAMMAD AZAM KHAN v. ASKARI LEASING LIMITED 2014 CLD 462
• SAJID AZIZ v. SECRETARY SCHOOLS 2014 PLC(CS) 464
• SHAFIQUE AHMAD v. PUBLIC AT LARGE 2014 YLR 465
• NAJEEB ULLAH v. MANGTA KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 469
• SHAMAS DIN v. State 2014 MLD 473
• SAIRA RANA v. UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL PUNJAB 2014 YLR 475
• SHIFA LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Health 2014 CLC 477

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

how to become a advocate from Narowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes