MUHAMMAD YASIR ANWAR versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY
Sections 16, 24 and 26 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Requirement Regulatory Registration of Employment Position, Impact of Subsequent Change / Increase in the Eligibility Criteria for Applicants Applicant, Eligibility Criteria for a Contracting Employee's Position Was denied regularly due to an increase of. After the appointment of the applicant the eligibility criteria for his appointment was changed, the qualification applicant was imposed on the qualification standard provided by the syndicate, which was in existence and on the relevant date (appointment). The eligibility eligibility applicant had to make a decision on the touchstone of quality available in the relevant date when he satisfactorily completed two years of service on the contract, then the qualification criteria were subsequently changed. And that the rules could not be re-instated by the disqualified and irrelevant committee which was separate from the scheme provided in the relevant They are lying, in particular, to defeat any right that the applicant had already accused of the principle of Lux punctuality would not allow the competent authority to revoke any appointment. Even if the defect is detected after a long period of time and as a result it can be removed. From the service university, the High Court directed that the applicant be treated unfairly as constitutional application of regular employees is allowed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
