Section 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 420, was found unlawful in the judgment of the breach of appeal against the acquittal of fraudulent and dishonest property, and against the evil imperative. There were specific features of the appeal, and the approach to dealing with the appeal was distinguished from the appeal against acquittal against the conviction because in the case of acquittal the possibility of double innocence was attached, the order of acquittal could only be intervened if If it turns out to be defamatory, misleading, arbitrary or stupid on its face, then a verdict is rendered. After the conviction of the acquittal by the court of competent jurisdiction, the trial court was competent to hear and after the judgment of the competent court was acquitted, the concept of acquittal would be doubled, while in certain circumstances and without Adopting the principle of double exploitation of sin, the verdict given by the trial court may not be interfered with, when there was no weakness or illegality in the bad order J, the classes were not guilty of any error of law, and The law derived by the trial court was strictly in accordance with the law, the appeal should be of any merit. Was excluded because, in conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
