Find a Lawyer

SHAMAS DIN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 365b The abductor banning the abducting woman from taking a marriage had different stand on different forums and in this case the prosecution mentioned in the FIR There was intense suspicion in the story of the accused and the benefit of such suspicion was expressed by the High Court with the fear that it had become normal when the girl / kidnapper joined her parents from her first position. Had taken somersault. The mere act of guilt had no basis in denying bail to an accused who would otherwise be entitled to a relief case against the accused who sought further investigation of his crime under section 497 (2). ), CR PC bail conditions were allowed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SAJID AZIZ v. SECRETARY SCHOOLS 2014 PLC(CS) 464
• SHAFIQUE AHMAD v. PUBLIC AT LARGE 2014 YLR 465
• FAZAL KHALIQ v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY 2014 CLC 465
• NAJEEB ULLAH v. MANGTA KHAN 2014 PCrLJ 469
• SAIRA RANA v. UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL PUNJAB 2014 YLR 475
• SHIFA LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary Health 2014 CLC 477
• D.G. KHAN CEMENT COMPANY LTD. v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary 2014 PTD 478
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN alias BAGGA v. State 2014 PCrLJ 479

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

power of attorney advocate Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes