Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd, Benefit of Common Intention Evidence Apprehension Doubt more than 2 hours after the FIR occurred Post mortem examination was performed, which resulted in a delay of 18/2 hours. Happened. For such a delay, the incident could be viewed without explanation and it was said that the prosecution had been delayed in agreeing to the false and fabricated story to get the witnesses present. And the FIR was not listed at the time it was mentioned, both the complainant and the deceased witness were witnesses of the occasion as they were both residents of the area from where the incident took place. But witnesses described their presence. IQ did not appeal the defects present in the prosecution's case, which was alleged by the prosecutor, alleging that the defendant could not benefit from prosecution because of the pistol recovery. In the absence of any matching report of the pistol vacancy reported by the laboratory, the alleged recovery of the pistol was unusual, the present case being subject to a number of circumstances, which caused serious doubt. The prosecution's failure to prove his case against any of the suspects accused of the prosecution's story was proven by the trial court to have been set aside. He was acquitted of the charge and was released under circumstances to give him the benefit of the doubt
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
