MUHAMMAD MASOOD KHAN versus JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE
Sections 7, 9 and 20 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 489F Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application unlawfully issue a check, and upon completion of the duty, the declaration and submission of the jurisdiction of the default banking court A trial case has been set up. With the permanent injunction against the defendant / bank in the Banking Court Court, the accounts passed the order in favor of the applicant, in which the defendant / bank did not accept any non-refundable loan against the applicant bank. In a question issued by the petitioner in favor of the bank hearing the petition before the Justice of the Peace for the registration of a criminal case against the transferred applicant, which was banned from taking legal action. Insult filed on behalf of insufficient order, plea filed against criminal justice The order of registration was that the applicant believed that he was a consumer and the bank was a finance company. The Institutional Bank, the financial institution of the bank financial institutions (Rehabilitation) Ordinance 2001, could have followed the procedure and made its default. Banking courts can have litigation with special jurisdiction to recover debts. Obtaining an unwanted order from Justice of Peace, the bank's ultimate purpose was to initiate proceedings under Section 489F, PPC because dishonesty of the Czech financial institution (Financial Recovery) Ordinance 2001 issued by the applicant in favor of the bank. Was done To start proceedings under the PPC were quite different, as both laws could not be merged or intertwined, the party
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
