Section 497 Fiduciary Code (XLV of 1860), Section 489F falsely issuing a check guarantee, failing to comply with the court's instructions regarding the submission of the disputed amount, the plaintiff failed to perform the terms of the contract and He allegedly offered an additional Rs 23 lakh to violate the sale agreement and in this regard an alleged check of Rs 93 lakh was issued in favor of the complainant, Syed on appearing before the bank check. Check was dishonored. The complainant contends that the defendant was not entitled to post-arrest bail because he had previously given an under-tax to the Supreme Court for depositing disputed money to seek relief in the pre-arrest bail, and since such action was taken The accused was not honored, so he was arrested and made an agreement before the Supreme Court to submit the disputed amount, but due to his failure, a bail plea was not granted before his arrest and a request for bail was granted. After the withdrawal, the matter was closed. Such a son, given by the accused, could not always be on his way to seek relief from the bail, but after the arrest, the bail application should also consider its merits. Look at the law to overcome it, without being affected by the action taken by the complainant complainant, the accused was offered an additional Rs 23 lakh on the failure of the deal, and such investigation It is necessary to know whether to actually check the controversial check worth Rs 93 lakh. Payment will be issued by the complainant for payment
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
