Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE)/DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SARGODHA

Sections 32 and 34 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 10A & 1991 order to abolish the constitutional petition were passed on the showcase notice show notice without giving the applicant the opportunity to hear. Unnecessary orders of natural justice were upheld without notification and without the opportunity of a hearing, and on this basis no permission could be attached to the superstructure because of the basic rights of due process and a fair trial. Violating inapplicable orders, therefore enforceable by asserting constitutional jurisdiction Constitutional application was allowed, unnecessary High Court orders were set aside

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.1, MULTAN 2014 CLD 1364
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 MLD 1364
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1373
• SHAHBAZ AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2014 YLR 1374
• Dr. SIDDIQA SULTANA v. Mrs. ZENAT ZULFIQAR 2014 CLC 1377
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. BASHIR BROTHERS 2014 PTD 1377
• NOOR MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. Hafiz ALLAH BAKHSH 2014 YLR 1381
• JAHANGIR MEHMOOD CHEEMA v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD 2014 CLD 1384

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

inheritance advocates near Tobatek Singh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes