Article 5, Schedule Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), suit for recovery of articles relating to OX, R 13 Dover and dowry, no precedent, no reason to appear before the court, effect wife Has filed a lawsuit for recovery. Counsel consulted on press and dowry articles against the petitioner's husband / applicant, but during the evidence, he stopped pursuing the case, the previous action against the applicant husband was initiated, and in this case the wife The decision was made in favor of. The plea with the request to revoke the previous injunction is that he went to help his family because of the flood in his mother's village, and for this reason he could neither appear in court nor be allowed by his lawyer. Even if the applicant is (far and away) not available, his lawyer is present in the court to pursue this case. Even today, telephone and mobile facilities are available everywhere, including the village. No one can plead that he is in a village because he was unable to contact his lawyer in the city, request Czar had taken to set partmnt previous discourse, the appellate court upheld the verdict against her husband as the former partmnt applicant below right. The constitutional application was dismissed accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
