Find a Lawyer

MALIK DILAWAR KHAN versus BAKHTIAR AHMED

The plaintiff of Section 24SumScope did not submit the sum of Zarosom in compliance with the trial court's order and his case was dismissed. Was instructed to present the index. And no order was granted to submit the same justification. There was no justification for speculation with judicial proceedings, and strong and irrefutable evidence was needed to reject such strong ideas pre-emptor 30 days. The maximum amount of damage was to be deposited on Som. Nature cannot necessarily be excused for failing to comply with the law and to protect its end. The plaintiff failed to submit the gold sum due to his own actions and rightly dismissed his case. And the orders passed by both the courts were present. According to the law, the plaintiff did not offer any good reason or scope for the failure to submit the damages within the stipulated time as the circumstances excluded. Is gone

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD SAJJAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1733
• BABAR HUSSAIN v. FARAH HUSSAIN 2014 CLC 1737
• MUHAMMAD SHER v. MAULA BAKHSH 2014 CLC 1745
• RASHID AHMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 2014 YLR 1748
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1753
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2014 MLD 1756
• Syed AKBAR HUSSAIN v. Mst. NAZIRAN BEGUM 2014 CLC 1760
• ALZAIR TRAVEL AND TOURS (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Regligious Affairs 2014 CLC 1766

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

property advocates from Wan Radha Ram lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes