For the specific performance of the Section 12 contract exchange agreement, the plaintiff claimed that there was an agreement between the parties regarding the transfer of the landed property and that it was surrendered to each other and the defendant's claim. On denial, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the lower appellate court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff's property, claiming that the plaintiff's property contradicts the claim and is legitimate property because the rent. The deal itself was not enough to prove a transfer agreement. If the concurrent law was proved in accordance with the law, the plaintiff failed to prove the existence of the law, the High Court refused to interfere with the decision, and the decree passed by the lower appellate court was not contrary. Tion100 in the law to attract the supply of seconds, the CPC second appeal was denied in the circumstances. n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
