Section 14 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), the suit for possession of section 8 immovable property, was that the suit was acquired through a lease deed by the defendants while the defendants claim to have their own share. Was in the firm and the plaintiff was his agent. The trial court had dismissed the case. The plaintiff was unable to produce evidence on record in connection with the business and no source of income for paying the lease amount, as well as a document for establishing a business lease independent of the construction cost of the suit, was kept on record. In addition to the money, the construction cost was also met by the firm. The property acquired from the firm's money will become the property of the firm The partnership firm was not a legal entity. The suit property was leased in the name of one or all of the partners. And that was the case in the name of the plaintiff because the plaintiff's agent confessed to the possession of the defendants filed by the plaintiff that he was in favor of the trial hearing.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
