Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 34 and 109 of the Conspiracy, joint intent, independent guarantee, grant of further inquiry were not charged with the cancellation of any overt act. In addition to coercing the accused into firing on the agitators, he did not actively participate in the commission of the crime, besides no overt act was attributed to the accused, except that Had identified the co-accused as the victim was on their way. Practical treatment of the FIR shows that the accused was unarmed at the time of the commission of the alleged crime, so it did not raise the question of the recovery of the weapon of the crime, apparently the complainant was the cause of the accused in this case. A wide net was cast to get involved. A close relationship with the co-accused, who fired directly at the deceased, could be prosecuted after a trial on a question on suspicion of vicious liability of the accused. Prosecutor and defense suspect filed a case for further investigation of his crime, so, he was admitted on bail
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
