Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 337 A (i), 337 F (iii), 353, 427, 186, 109, 201 and 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 And 21 (i) Qatel-e-Azam, an excellent attempt to murder, which would prevent a civil servant from performing his duties in the Shuja-e-Khalifa, study, attack, or criminal force; , Disappearance, disappearance offense, joint intent, evidence of terrorist evidence, grant of two co-accused were granted bail by the trial court The role of the accused was that he was in league with the main accused at the time of the incident and He left the government vehicle And she was not hurt by anyone, so her involvement was clearly apparent (a police officer) was the investigator of the first incident in her police station, on the telephone, she was linked to the complainant in this case. Could not be understood as a role. Nothing was recovered from the involvement of the other co-accused, as was the case with the suspect's involvement, and the extent to which he was responsible can only be determined after the recording of the evidence, the doctor's report states. The accused was a hepatitis patient and was suffering from diabetes, neuropathic pain and other ailments; the prison could not be properly cared for. Also, the detention of the accused in the jail would not serve any purpose. Bail was not granted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
