Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus KASHIF IQBAL THROUGH MST. FAKHAR-UN-NISA

The decision under section 12 (2) on the application under Sections 12 (2) and 115 may be filed against the decision of the petition under Section 12 (2) under the Competitive Amendment Trial Court, which is amended by the CPC, If the appellate court had previously entertained and decided the case this way. The appeal can then be regarded as a revision decision which was competent but the second amendment was not worth it because the reviewing High Court subsequently turned this amendment into a constitutional application and dismissed it.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• Rana MUHAMMAD TAHSEEN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 102
• ASAD NAEEM v. State 2014 MLD 102
• BINYAMEEN KHALIL v. RIAZ AHMED RAHI 2014 CLC 105
• AIMS CORPORATION (PVT.) Ltd. v. HABIB BANK LIMITED 2014 CLD 107
• LIAQUAT ALI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, JHELUM 2014 CLC 112
• AHSAN ULLAH v. ILLAQA MAGISTRATE 2014 YLR 113
• ZULFIQAR ALI v. State 2014 MLD 117
• AHMAD DEEN v. ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LTD. 2014 CLD 119

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

power of attorney advocate Miran Shah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes