Section 13 Pond, the performance of the short sale that Plaintiffs described for sale was not credible, the informant did not mention the date and performance of the Talab Muwaiti Plateau and to prove the notice of the sale. It was necessary to prove the specific location and sale of knowledge was not a specific place because the wider space was not followed by the plaintiff's notice of the applicant, the postman was required to prove receipt of the notice of the applicant. It was not submitted that the appellant's finding of the first appellate court was claimed. It was proved that the files were not in accordance with the evidence available on the files, the plaintiff was obliged to prove Tolb's performance by producing a postman who performed the ban when the notice of the applicant was denied. By law, the plaintiff had to prove the sale of a particular property by producing a sales tool and without producing the same he could not prove it prematurely; the higher the right to the right; he needed to produce the sale mutation. As well as with the rights of the children who were registered to establish their rights at the time of sale in the registered accounts, the plaintiff had failed to prove his right at the time of filing the case and at the time of the injunction, premature discrimination on immovable land. Was rejected in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
