BANK OF PUNJAB versus ACCOUNTABILITY COURT NO.1, LAHORE
Article 25 (b) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Petitioner, Chairman of the NAB Scope Order of Appeal Deal, was approved by the Chairman on the petition filed by the trial court and the complaining bank of the trial court Was passed by the order of It is alleged that Chairman NAB mistakenly exercised its discretion. The arbitrary power used for the good of the public was the same as any arbitrary power of litigation which could be reviewed in the executive claim of absolute immunity of the chairman's decision. The NAB could not justify judicial review as it had jurisdiction over the Constitution established by the High Courts which could not be filed by any criminal or NAB court but was not affected. The party appealed this jurisdiction. The decision of Chairman NAB, etc., on the basis of exercise of discretion on wrong premises and irrationality was the result of illegal irrationality and incompetence of the rule and this was also against the principle of arbitrary structure Chairman NAB's decision on arbitrary exercise. Which was not under the law and contrary to public policy while accepting the terms and conditions of the application. The High Court put aside the decision of Chairman NAB, especially with regard to the commitment and payment method, and the trial court approved and the matter was remanded to the chairman after giving the opportunity for a hearing. Request for scrutiny and decision on the application made by. Take any method as per the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
