The definition of the smuggling and smuggling evidence of Section 9 (c) drug addicts has long been examined, but the defense failed to present any evidence in favor of the defense version, the prosecution's second witness also testified in the FIR. Reaffirmed the facts given, as well as the complainant. It was also subjected to a lengthy cross-examination, but without any concluding result it was raised that the prohibited non-cell was closed or tampered with, therefore, samples for the tester. Delay in sending would not affect the Chemical Examiner was positive, and the defense did not disagree with the nature of the prohibited dispute that any private person involved in witnessing the recovery was wrong, according to the Narcotic Material Stances Control Act of 1997 25 was not devoid of strength. , Article 103, CCP was dismissed from the trial court while noting the fact that the accused was the first culprit, an alternative to life imprisonment has already been sentenced. Had fully established his case against the accused, while in his true view the evidence available on the record correctly recorded the ear right and sentence against the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
