Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOBAN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

AXVII, R3 The Pre-Emission Act of 1991 (IX of 1991), Proof of Claim 6 Prevailing Claims The opportunist was given reasonable opportunity to present evidence but failed to present the same. , Was shut down in accordance with OXVII. , R 3, No material anomalies made by CPC trial court. The reasons for the decisions of both the courts below were for good reason that the circumstances were revoked.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SHAH MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2014 YLR 1489
• SAJJAD AHMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1490
• HAMAD RAZA v. State 2014 CLD 1493
• BABAR HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 1493
• GHULAM MURTAZA v. CITY POLICE OFFICER, RAWALPINDI 2014 YLR 1498
• IRFAN alias FANI v. State 2014 MLD 1502
• ASHRAF STEEL MILLS v. DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE 2014 PTD 1506
• Malik ZIA BASHIR v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2014 YLR 1509

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

power of attorney advocate Khanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes