Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus CITY POLICE OFFICER, RAWALPINDI

Section 22 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Instead of requesting alternative and effective treatment, instead of seeking exemption from the jurisdiction of the former officer Justice of Peace, the applicant on the accuracy of the High Court could not make it clear to the High Court that What are the unusual and unusual situations. In the presence of a reasonable and effective way provided under Section 22A for justifying the constitutional petition directly before the High Court, the petition was dismissed before the constitutional application of the PC could not proceed to the High Court.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SAJJAD AHMAD v. State 2014 PCrLJ 1490
• HAMAD RAZA v. State 2014 CLD 1493
• BABAR HUSSAIN v. State 2014 YLR 1493
• MUHAMMAD SHOBAN v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 2014 MLD 1497
• IRFAN alias FANI v. State 2014 MLD 1502
• ASHRAF STEEL MILLS v. DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE 2014 PTD 1506
• Malik ZIA BASHIR v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2014 YLR 1509
• WAHEED AHMED SIDDIQUI v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE 2014 MLD 1513

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

famous supreme court advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes