Sections 337A (i) and 337F (v) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 439 Appeal for extension of the offense of Shuja and Khalifa, testimony of Hussamah evidence, as well as the Appellate Court hearing its decision. ? The explanation presented by the investigating officer in connection with the delay in presenting the reason for the FIR assigned by the Investigating Officer in this regard, was continually relied upon by the lower courts without any evidence, without any evidence. Did not suggest the facts, nor was anything kept. On the record of the testimony admitted by the witnesses, the witnesses' relationship with the complainant had no legal basis for dismissing their evidence, unless there was a set of grounds for excluding their evidence. , Which could result in the accused being falsely accused. The existence of persons relationships, it had no legal effect, nor was it fatal to the prosecution case, there was no material contradiction, it was identified in the statements of the e-witness, who testified to the credibility of his testimony. In the following, both the trial and appellate courts not only discussed the evidence presented by the defendants in defense, and also considered it appropriate, but the defense's request was not found to be credible. Misconduct, or denial of material on the record, was identified, which revealed that the defendant was not subject to any legal impairment, as recorded by the courts below. And it doesn't need to be re-examined. In the presence of evidence, the mere fact that the statements are based on slight variations
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
