OV, Rr 20, 12 and O IX, R 6 (1) (a) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Constitution of Arts 164 and 181 of Pakistan, Article 10 A West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), Section 13 Deletion of Tenant Ex-Parte Order, Setting a Scope of Limit Alternate Servicing The applicant's departure was not shown in the request to be excluded from the application of the Audi ultimum Partum jurisdiction whereby the service was effective Can't be As an alternative and alternative alternative, alternative services were not adopted. When notices could not be provided by the usual service, it was necessary to adopt the service service when the service on the agent could be considered effective if it had, in the present case, the OV, R 12, CPC Terms of Service When his case was not properly effective. If the court does not restrict the provision of the law, the limitation will be overcome under Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, in the event of failure to serve notice of the hearing. Dyer Article 641 of the Limitation Act, 1908, when the Parliament was approved under ROOX, R6 (1) (A), filed between the parties within the time of appeal of the CPC filed by the tenant. Was able to decide on eligibility and no one should be. Inappropriate hearing on the basis of techniques should be provided to the appropriate parties; the law does not allow the parties to decide the dispute, only two parties can be judged only after deciding on the merit. After giving the parties a fair opportunity to provide leading evidence, the trial court was put aside and the cases
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
