MIRZA LUQMAN MASUD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION
Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court, the jurisdiction of the Constitution of the Civil Service, the applicants appointed respondents who were not serving in the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court. To restrict itself to such jurisdiction as the Constitution had the power of the High Court to direct any person to perform duties in connection with the affairs of the provincial federation or local authority, which is permitted by law. Had nothing to do with it. In the case of a writ of quarantine for public office, the law was also imposed but in its territorial jurisdiction neither the respondents were appointed by the authorities in Islamabad and He had never worked under the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court High Court. The court refused to ask the respondents in the Wari case to explain under what authority of the law they held their positions as it was in violation of the constitutional authority of the High Court applicant. Failed to conclude that the High Court could exercise jurisdiction against the defendants who were neither appointed nor could perform their duties. In the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court, the respondents did not hold any office constituted by the Constitution of Pakistan and were performing their duties within the territory of the province or in which case the province was included under which the High Court had jurisdiction. In these circumstances, the petition is dismissed
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015
