Find a Lawyer

ABDUL QAYYUM versus ABDUL GHAFFAR

Section 13 Removal of Tenants The payment of rent requires that the landlord's personal necessity remain in his possession, and that the registered owners of the shops are not present. Both parties had litigation regarding the title of the property, the civil suit was pending before the court of jurisdiction and the landlords themselves chose to enter the civil court. Their title could not be decided on the tenancy-related shop question before the appropriate course of landlord's proper course for the landlord awaiting the final decision pending civil litigation between them. Was and the rent controller's search and tenant argued well in relation to the landlord's appeal to the landlord was dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2015

• Mirza LUQMAN MASUD v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION 2015 PLC(CS) 526
• NAWAB KHAN alias DAH KHAN v. State 2015 PCrLJ 539
• Malik MUNIR AHMED v. Sardar KHAIR MUHAMMAD TAJIK 2015 CLC 560
• The STATE through Regional Director Anti-Narcotics Force, Quetta v. ABDUL HAMEED 2015 YLR 568
• LA GUARDIA GROUP OF COMPANIES v. ABDUL NAFEY 2015 CLC 620
• MOHAE-UD-DIN v. The STATE through Prosecutor-General Balochistan 2015 PCrLJ 621
• ALI MUHAMMAD BALOCH v. State 2015 YLR 666
• FAREEDULLAH v. MUZAFFAR ALI 2015 YLR 730

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2015 →

solicitors from Issa Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes