Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O VI, R 1 & 5 100 Suit for the specific performance of the contract, the agreement of the second appellant's appeal by the principal jurisdiction was that no authority to compromise. The attorney was not given and the statement recorded by him had no legal value, as well as a suit by the agent on the basis of a statement from the Principal Validity General Power of Attorney on the record. A decision was made on the basis of which this statement was recorded, which resulted in unwanted decisions and the order was valid. And assisting when the defendant had made a statement that the defendant did not know the statement recorded by the lawyer, if his evidence did not provide any evidence If so, the party can go to trial. This request may be supported or supported by the request which was not made in the request. If he was fraudulent or misrepresented by these agents, the plaintiff did not usually include the attorney with the appeal and in his absence no fraudulent address could be detected. The second appeal was valid only if the unenforceable decision was contrary to the law or presented without deciding a material issue of the law or there was a mistake in the procedure provided by the law for any such appeal. Request not picked up that was not maintained. The scope of the second appeal was limited. Only Rs. 500,000 and another appeal was not eligible. Due to uncertain decisions and orders by the courts
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
