Section 13 and 15 (6) of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the termination of the section 5 delay of the appeal of the tenants, with the unanimous consent of the parties, determined the payment of fair rent was a dispute of the tenants determined to pay the rent. That they themselves had become controversial. Removal requests were simultaneously rejected when shops were removed from their resources. The limitation period shall continue from the date of preparation of the copy and may not be extended from the date of delivery of the suit benefit of section 5 of the Act 1908 to the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Act under section 15 (6) of the Ordinance 1959. Was not applicable and the limitation period, ie 30 days before the date of the order appealed against, was delayed. Such appeals could not be denied. The tenants responsible for rejecting this score alone have built controversial shops out of their own pockets as the two parties agreed to fix the rent correctly and the request is invalid and no withdrawal order can be approved. The two courts below had properly evaluated and applied the evidence presented by the parties to which the applicable law was properly applied.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
