A. XXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Application for Approval of Temporary Order of Appeal for Section 52 Suit Declaration, Applying Principle Theory There was no direct relation to the granting or denial of the interim injunction, direct relevance to the rejection or denial of the interim injunction, in keeping with the nature of the status quo in relation to the principle of lis pendant. Didn't have In order to protect the rights of the plaintiff the property which was in litigation had to be made that the first case was present at the time of hearing of the petition, the balance of the facility was in his favor and the irrevocable refusal of the injunction would cause irreparable harm. Will The suit was not in possession of the power of attorney was not misused to transfer the suit property in the name of the accused. The record shows that the plaintiff had paid some money to buy the suit property in the name of the defendant, the payment of tax alone was not sufficient in the case of the plaintiff as the order was temporarily granted to the claimant. Irreparable harm. Notwithstanding the provision of the provisional injunction, i.e. the element of the preliminary injunction, the balance of the facility and irreparable loss will not protect the rights of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff. The absence of a single ingredient on the facts and the record also cannot temporarily justify the injunction when it was identified while approving defective orders \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
