Find a Lawyer

SAJID ZAIB versus HARM ANEEQA

Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The issue of suit jewelery for the restoration of gold jewelry was not properly compiled and the dispute regarding the possession of evidence and quantities led by the parties was not addressed. Was. Based on the evidence and petitions available by the following courts, the same things recorded were diversified and invalid jurisdiction led to the wrongful jurisdiction under which the orders passed by the courts on the issue of gold jewelry were separated. Was remanded and a remand was obtained for trial. The court failed to identify the defendant's husband by instructing her to dismiss the case regarding the gold jewelry that the investigations filed by the courts in connection with the recovery of the recovery allowance were not admissible to the evidence, No judicial defect was identified in connection with the recovery allowance inquiries. Significant rent allowance excluded to the extent of issuing a constitutional application

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE 2014 PTD 1939
• NISAR AHMAD alias SARU v. State 2014 YLR 1947
• AHMAD YAR KHAN v. Hafiz MEHBOOB AHMAD 2014 YLR 1955
• NATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AND ECONOMICS, LAHORE v. HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 YLR 1967
• AMIR GHAUS v. MUHAMMAD JAHANGIR IQBAL 2014 YLR 1986
• UZMA RANI v. REGISTRAR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2014 YLR 2000
• MAGNA PROCESSING INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD., FAISALABAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through SECRETARY, (REVENUE DIVISION) MINISTRY OF FINANCE 2014 PTD 2005
• MUHAMMAD ASAD v. ABDULLAH TAHIR 2014 YLR 2021

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

law firms from Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes