The defendant was arrested in favor of the defendants on the basis of Section 42 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 suit gift / forfeiture and fraud of Tamil Proof of Components and the lower appellate court. Dismissed the appeal of the accused. In search of a combination of facts, every justification entry was to be recorded in the presence of the person who had been entitled and if it is said that the person was identified by two honorable persons. Signatures / thumb prints identifying witnesses on the change entry will also be received by the Revenue Officer, if the parties did not appear at the time of the approval of the changes, they would have looted the entire defendant's case / valid gift / Offering, accepting and acquiring possession to prove the three components to Tamils were unconstitutional, whose written statements did not provide the necessary details of where and how the gift / Tamil transaction took place. There was no description of the offer or payment of the sale, nor is there any description of how the donor offered the gift to the defendants and it was also told that the executors When did he accept the offer and how was the physical possession given. The defendants / beneficiaries performed failed to establish a sale transaction, and the Tamils, respectively, had to prove the right of the Tamils to their right, especially in situations where some legal heirs had legitimate rights to their inheritance. The defendant's dispute was that the plaintiff was deprived of his right to inherit the marriage of his choice.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
