Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MAHMOOD AHMAD versus ABDUL GHAFOOR


Under the jurisdiction of the section 8 and 9 High Court's shareholders / applicants, the final results of the courts were excluded from joint property by another partner or partner who had been excluded from the property in his or her partner. Another partner was in possession of the property under section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, in order to regain possession of the property, or by filing for the distribution partner, the suit was conferred on the property in November 1999, while section 8 of the The case under the Special Relief Act, 1877, which was filed by another co-partner in 2001, was not a verdict and both the courts passed the ruling, ignoring the legal position involved in the case. Was not sustained under, the circumstances and decisions allowed a civil review and were approved by the courts below. Orders placed were set aside

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Deh Pathaan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.