On the basis of the fingerprint expert scope defendant's report, the Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract injunction filed a request to compare the impression of his thumb with the one alleged by the plaintiff, The two sides recorded their statements and agreed that if the expert's report was contested by the expert about the thumb impression on the contract, then they did not object to it and said that the report and suit would be decided by the expert. The report is that if the impression of the thumb was not of the defendant, then the defendant does not object to the dismissal of the case. Will call. The fingerprint expert said the thumb impressions were similar to those of the defendant, but they filed a request for a settlement and a report of the fingerprint report, which was dismissed by the trial court and the trial was dismissed. Shortcut was used to dispel the claim by the plaintiff but he failed and he defamed all concerned persons, including Trial Court A, his lawyer, who had been attacked for some time, and he was openly court-martialed. I did not come, I was not entitled to any discretion from the court when a party decided the lace The method adopted and emphasized the pressing him before the court. The adoption of the same was not against the law and was adopted, and the result was against the party which stated that the party could not be allowed to withdraw from that commitment before the court could be revised. Be excluded from the limit.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
