Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd, Definition of common intention evidence The benefit of the suspect was not named in the FIR, which was registered against two unidentified accused, height, color, age, etc. of the accused. No description of. The accused named in the FIR was involved in the matter through a written request filed 20/25 days after the incident by the complainant, there was no source of information, as the complainant was charged with the accused and his How did you find out the name and role of the co-accused? During the incident, the application was mentioned, the identity of the accused was not paraded, or the case of his co-accused was registered, the names of the prosecution witnesses were not named in the FIR, the identity of the parade. Conduct was necessary, the complainant and the prosecution had other witnesses. , Was a resident of another village, located 12 / 13km from the location of the incident, both said the witnesses were not witnesses to the situation in the circumstances, due to their presence on the spot, in the FIR at the relevant time. The presence of eyewitnesses at the time of the incident, evidence from the court's testimony was also denied. Arrived at the scene, but no firearms, nor any motorcycle was recovered during the investigation. The prosecution has not proven any motive. However, the prosecution failed to prove it. Outside the trial against the accused, the doubts, convictions and convictions filed by the trial court against the accused were set aside and he was acquitted of the charges.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
