Section 4 surety confiscation was charged with adopting the confiscation method for which the applicant was on bail, after appearing before the court, the accused's bail was already dismissed and a notice was issued under section 141414. Went to CRPC, the applicant / bail was issued. And the applicant's property commitment was directed to proceed under Section 141414, CR PC, which was the procedure to be followed. (i) cancellation and confiscation of bail bonds in favor of the state; (ii) issuing a show cause notice in this regard as to why the forfeiture of the surety bond cannot be punished and why it cannot be recovered? (iii) If the showcase notice is answered, or made without justification, then a fine or otherwise may be granted, depending on the facts and circumstances present. (iv) In order to recover the amount of fines, proceedings on the enclosure, and the sale of immovable property, must be continued. And (v) if there is no fixed property in the bail, and he fails to pay the fine, he may be sent to a civil jail for a term which may extend up to six months, in the present case, the special The judge had the cancellation of the bail and did not cancel, but issued a direct notice under Section 514, CR PC. And without having to struggle to respond to the showcase notice, the warrant was first issued to attach the surety property. And without waiting for it, the warrant of arrest was also issued for arrest warrant against the impugned order cannot be justified, and accordingly the court
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
