ATTA MUHAMMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TOUNSA SHARIF
Sections 26 and 13 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. VII, R 11 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution of the Constitution, to strengthen the holding bar on the Civil Court The case is listed. Rejecting the Plaintiff's Jurisdiction Against the Procedure of Sustainability Civil courts were the ultimate and absolute jurisdictional courts and had jurisdiction over whether any authority or tribunal had exceeded or exceeded that authority. Its actions are against the law. The tribunal or authority passed this order before the civil courts when it was alleged that a decree had been obtained from fraud and misrepresentation, not just the tribunal or the authority to withdraw or separate the same case. But the civil courts will take action. Civil civil courts should not be considered jurisdiction for declaring fraud and correcting false courts unless a person's case falls within it, alleging frivolity, fraud or misrepresentation. Had filed a review before the Board of Revenue, which was dismissed and rejected the review request which was also rejected and both the above orders were filed by the plaintiff and challenged by the amending court. The trial court was dismissed for handling the car. No weakness was identified under Section 26 of the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960. Civil court refuses to proceed with lace unless its jurisdiction is with jurisdiction, trial
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
