Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE


Section 186 and 506 Drugs Act (XXI of 1976), Sections 27 (3) and (4) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Articles 227 and 243 Interpretation of public liability to public servants and appreciation of criminal threatening evidence I changed the charges Initially, when charged, the accused did not plead guilty but, after eight months, the charge was changed and the accused pleaded guilty and was convicted by the trial court. At sentencing, even if the accused has proven guilt during the trial, at his request, the independent evidence is merely a consequence by the court. Should have been collected, the High Court sentenced the trial court and put the sentence aside and after recording the evidence, the matter was remanded to the trial court, in which case an appeal was allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
female advocates from Kot Mithan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.