Section 2 302 (b) of the Qatil-e-Amad evidence, benefiting from the FIR of the suspect, was recorded in this case an hour after the incident, and eleven hours after that incident, a post-mortem examination was carried out on the victim's body. The situation, the possibility of a preliminary investigation and consultation before reporting the matter to the police, cannot be ruled out. While the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses had improved their statements, the Ocular Account witness did not show any valid reason for his presence on the occasion. Relevance of the accused at the relevant time was not proved in accordance with the law. The court issued a declaration that there was no order in writing on record under which, under section 8787, the PC required that the accused be a felony. When it could not be used against him, according to the complainant's own version the first case was repressed, then there was no reason or opportunity to kill the accused, the purpose of the ND, the most important piece of evidence. Fragments, and only if the relevant evidence, ie, the ocular account, was affecting the trust, which in the present case was 8 mm. There was no allegation of the rifle retrieval, which was allegedly infected with the suspect's example, but was not consistent. Since no vacancies were recovered by chance and no report of the illegal science laboratory was suspicious about the record prosecution case, there was no need to discuss the version of the accused under section 342, CRPC The prosecution failed to contact the accused. The commission of the crime, conviction and punishment was established by the trial court;
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
